12-20-2023 07:42 AM
Hallo BCI-Team,
I found different Eventnummers from the MES, which are not implementet at the NxMesBase.
Is it also possible to write Nexeed Mes Base or Nexeed DDL Event Base instead of MES Base in Objettype! With the naming MES Base it is not clear which “base” we are talking about here. And very often we get feedback from the MES@AE team that there are missing error texts. But unfortunately there is nothing we can do here.
I would be very happy if the exchange of error numbers between Nexeed MES and the automation team were optimized.
Secondly, it would help us if the name "MES Base" wasn't just used.
Thanks alot!
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-20-2023 11:02 AM
I totally agree that the update of error texts should be optimized. The texts in the NxMesBase object are up-to-date concerning the latest published version of the MES texts. I will try to find out why there are unpublished error numbers, but this will probably take some time.
About the naming: The name follows our standard naming convention. We always leave the prefix Nx or Nexeed out in the internal object name. DDL Event Base would be wrong because the same base object is also used with OPC UA communication.
02-28-2024 09:56 AM - edited 02-28-2024 10:02 AM
Unfortunately I found another error number (100020187) that is missing from the NxMesBase.
02-28-2024 02:16 PM
This error does not come from MES but directly from the DDL message FB. And the text is not missing. I can see it in your screenshot.